Sat 2 Jan 2010
Somebody on a listserve I’m on trashed Avatar recently. Having just stated on the same listserve that I liked the movie, I felt compelled to respond. I can’t post the post I was responding to, but it should be pretty clear the sorts of things they were saying in my response:
Hi **********,
***********Spoiler alert**********
As someone who enjoyed the film I feel compelled to respond.
Cameron is the first to admit that the story is a hodge-podge of all his favourite science fiction tropes gleaned since childhood. I don’t see how this is a bad thing as long as it’s not plagiarism, and the original sources are not denied; we all stand on the shoulders of giants. No less a misanthrope than Harlan Ellison has stated that he would have been fine with Cameron “stealing” his ideas if only he had been credited (for Terminator).
Yes, the natives are Noble Savages but again I don’t see why that in itself is bad. We’re not allowed to create stories about primitive cultures, or allegedly advanced cultures encountering those primitive cultures?
Your main criticism (if I’ve interpreted it correctly) seems to be
that the so-called primitive (non white, somewhat matriarchal) society needed to be saved by a member of a so-called advanced (white, male) society. However, in the film it doesn’t appear he taught them much. He certainly taught them little or nothing about fighting. For one thing he didn’t have much time to. He simply led them, brought them together to fight, inspired by the example of a previous generation of natives (as opposed to some innate “white” wisdom he himself brought to the table). And ultimately when his attempt to thwart the enemy
failed, it was Pandora itself that responded, achieving success with its own methods, spurred into action by the memories and knowledge of a woman (admittedly white).I would submit that the white man learned far more from this primitive culture (and the example of least two female mentors and role models) than he taught them. Specifically, environmentalism and how to utilize (as opposed to exploit) your environment. In return, the only thing he really taught them was the reality of the threat that they faced, which (through no fault of their own) they were ill-equipped to
appreciate. And why shouldn’t he be allowed to teach them that if that was what they needed to learn, and it was all he had to offer in return for the riches with which they endowed him?Finally, when the hero faced the American military leader in the end, the larger battle had already been won, by Pandora. He was not therefore fighting on behalf of the natives at this point. The final confrontation was about saving his own life. And he didn’t even win that fight; he needed to be saved by a native (a woman, no less).
I would like to hear your unabridged thoughts on this movie’s
treatment of heterosexism, anthropomorphism, gender politics, Real Men and the fight between military (male) and cultural sensitivity etc. to understand exactly what else about this (in my opinion) really quite enjoyable movie got under your skin.Regards,
Joe
January 3rd, 2010 at 6:57 pm
Obviously the previous critic was doing the sort of knee-jerk reactionary spouting that the internet is so good at breeding. As I’ve stated and others have stated no-one is going to mistake Cameron for insert-name-of-brilliant-screenwriter-here. He makes visually epic, action filled generally enjoyable movies. Most of the moaning I’ve heard thus far all seems to echo the bitchfests that accompanied the new Star Wars films…the fact that all these twerps cannot dissociate their current jaded, smart ass selves from the twelve year olds they were who thought they’d just witnessed the creation of *film* when they saw those movies as kids. At least they managed to hang on to that level of maturity.