This is a response to a comment left by a Mr. Heywood after my previous post.
Upon reading the comment I thought to myself, who is this Heywood character? I inquired of my good friend Joe Mahoney who informed me that Heywood is something of a guru in the field of science fiction. Whereas Joe and myself are merely fans of the genre, Heywood (whose first name is Fergus) actually knows a thing or two about it.
Nevertheless a response is called for.
After I posted some of my favourite science fiction books of all time, Mr. Heywood wrote:
So Barney… only one book that’s less than 25 years old? Really?
After I got over the remarkable familiarity of the comment (Barney? Really, Mr. Heywood), I pondered the sentiment. Clearly Heywood believes I am stuck in the past, or not up to date on the subject of science fiction. On this point he may well be right. I have no doubt that he is better read than I am. I know little of his circumstances, but myself, what with the pressures of a full time job and raising a nephew on my own, I have precious little time to read (let alone blog).
But I have read several modern writers, Robert J. Sawyer, Robert Charles Wilson, and Mark Rayner to name just three of my current favourites. I greatly admire their work. They’ve written some damned fine novels.
They’re just not my ABSOLUTE absolute favourites. (Yes, even Rayner! Sorry Mr. Rayner. Although I haven’t read The Amadeus Net yet.)
Should my top five list necessarily include completely up-to-date works? Must it be based on quotas? Two or three modern works, two or three works by women etc? No. My list was just straight from the heart.
There are many more older works of fiction than there are new ones. It just stands to reason there would be a greater number of classics among a greater number of works. Doesn’t it?
Now I would like to hear Mr. Heywood’s list of must reads…